Standard Wireline Data Processing

 

 

Science operator: Texas A&M University

Hole: U1482C

Expedition: 363

Location: Scott Plateau (tropical SE Indian Ocean)

Latitude: 15° 3.3298' S

Longitude: 120° 26.1135' E

Logging date: October 24, 2016

Sea floor depth (driller's): 1476.1 m DRF

Sea floor depth (logger's): 1476.5 m WRF (MSS/HRLA/APS/HLDS/EDTC/HNGS downlog)

Total penetration:  2010.6 m DRF (534.5 m DSF)

Total core recovered: 536.34 m (103.7% of cored section)

Oldest sediment recovered: 10 My

Lithology: nannofossil and foraminiferal ooze, chalk

 

 

 

Data

 

The logging data was recorded by Schlumberger in DLIS format. Data were processed at the Borehole Research Group of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in October 2016.

 

Logging Runs

Tool string
Pass
Top depth (m WMSF) Bottom depth (m WMSF) Pipe depth (m WMSF) Notes
1.MSS/HRLA/APS/HLDS/EDTC/HNGS
Downlog
0
533
83.5

Caliper closed and APS minitron off. Invalid APS and HLDS. Depth reference

Repeat
376
534
open hole
Main
0
534
83.5
2.FMS/DSI/GPIT/EDTC/HNGS
Downlog
0
516
76.5
Caliper closed. Invalid FMS.
Pass 1
129
515
open hole
Pass 2
0
510
76.5

 

 

In preparation for logging, the pipe was lowered to about 83.5 m DRF and the hole was pumped with seawater.

 

The MSS/HRLA/APS/HLDS/EDTC/HNGS tool string was run first, with the APS minitron turned off during the downlog. A short repeat pass was recorded, followed by the main pass from total depth to the sea floor. No major problems were encountered during the recording. However, re-entering the drill pipe proved to be difficult as the logging string head would not pass easily through the lockable float valve. After pumping seawater and rotating the pipe the logging string was eventually able to pass throgh without any damage. The difficulty was possibly due to the presence of dense clay coating the tools and the tool head, especially the centralizers, which was observed once the tool string reached the sea floor.

The FMS/DSI/GPIT/EDTC/HNGS tool string was run next. Prior to the recording, the drill pipe was raised to about 76.5 m DRF in order to maximize the amount of FMS data collected in open hole. A downlog (with caliper closed) and two uplog passes were recorded. Again, getting into the pipe proved to be difficult but eventually the tool string made it to the surface without any damage.

 

Since the sea conditions were calm (peak-to-peak heave of <0.5 m), the wireline heave compensator was not used during the logging operations. However, a 4m tide was expected at the site and could affect the log depths since it cannot be eliminated during the data acquistion process.

 

The depths in the table are for the processed logs (after depth shift to the sea floor and depth matching between passes). Generally, discrepancies may exist between the sea floor depths determined from the downhole logs and those determined by the drillers from the pipe length. Typical reasons for depth discrepancies are ship heave, wireline and pipe stretch, tides, and the difficulty of getting an accurate sea floor from a 'bottom felt' depth in soft sediment.

 

Processing

 

Depth shift to sea floor and depth match. The original logs were first shifted to the sea floor (- 1476.5 m). The sea floor depth was determined by the step in gamma ray values at - 1476.5 observed on the downlog of the MSS/HRLA/APS/HLDS/EDTC/HNGS run. This differs by 0.4  m from the sea floor depth given by the drillers (see above). The depth-shifted logs have then been depth-matched to the gamma ray log from the downlog of the MSS/HRLA/APS/HLDS/EDTC/HNGS tool string.

 

Depth matching is typically done in the following way. One log is chosen as reference (base) log (usually the total gamma ray log from the run with the greatest vertical extent and no sudden changes in cable speed), and then the features in the equivalent logs from the other runs are matched to it in turn. This matching is performed manually. The depth adjustments that were required to bring the match log in line with the base log are then applied to all the other logs from the same tool string.

 

Environmental corrections. The HNGS and HRLA data were corrected for hole size during the recording. The APS and HLDS data were corrected for standoff and hole size respectively during the recording.

 

High-resolution data. Bulk density (HLDS) and neutron porosity (APS) data were recorded sampling rates of 2.54 and 5.08 cm, respectively, in addition to the standard sampling rate of 15.24 cm. The enhanced bulk density curve is the result of Schlumberger enhanced processing technique performed on the MAXIS system onboard. While in normal processing short-spacing data is smoothed to match the long-spacing one, in enhanced processing this is reversed. In a situation where there is good contact between the HLDS pad and the borehole wall (low-density correction) the results are improved, because the short spacing has better vertical resolution. Gamma Ray data from the SGT tool were recorded at sampling rates of 5.08 and 15.24 cm. 

 

Acoustic data. The dipole shear sonic imager (DSI) was operated in the following modes: P&S monopole and upper and lower dipole (run/pass) in all three passes. The velocities were computed from the DTCO (compressional monopole), and DT1/DT2 (shear lower and upper dipole) delay times. They are generally of good quality.

 

Quality Control

 

The quality of the data is assessed by checking against reasonable values for the logged lithologies, by repeatability between different passes of the same tool, and by correspondence between logs affected by the same formation property (e.g. the resistivity log should show similar features to the sonic velocity log). The sonic logs showed a nice cyclic effect around 373-450 m WSF that showed up both in the compressional and shear data and correlated with a cyclic gamma ray at the same depths.

 

Gamma ray logs recorded through bottom hole assembly (BHA) and drill pipe should be used only qualitatively, because of the attenuation of the incoming signal. The thick-walled BHA attenuates the signal more than the thinner-walled drill pipe.

 

A wide (>12") and/or irregular borehole affects most recordings, particularly those that require eccentralization and a good contact with the borehole wall (APS, HLDS). Hole diameter was recorded by the hydraulic caliper on the HLDS tool (LCAL) and by the FMS tool (C1 and C2). The hole diamteter was mostly between 12 and 16 inches, with higher values in the presence of washouts, and less than 12 inches in the lower third of the hole.

 

A null value of -999.25 may replace invalid log values.

 

Additional information about the drilling and logging operations can be found in the Operations and Downhole Measurements sections of the expedition report, Proceedings of the International Ocean Discovery Program, Expedition 363. For further questions about the logs, if the hole is still under moratorium please contact the staff scientist of the expedition.


After the moratorium period you may direct your questions to:

 

Cristina Broglia

Phone: 845-365-8343

Fax: 845-365-3182

E-mail: Cristina Broglia

 

Tanzhuo Liu

Phone: 845-365-8630

Fax: 845-365-3182

E-mail: Tanzhuo Liu